Monday, August 20, 2012

What Is Genuine Research?

The word "research" has been used loosely. Supporting an argument has been reduced to a simple search over the internet. In high school, "research" is indeed used to describe an activity that primarily involves looking over books, journals or nowadays, the world-wide web.

In higher education, "research" is different. It actually involves finding the answers that are not available yet. To illustrate this, I have picked one specific example. The question is: "Does abstinence-only sex education work?". It is a timely question. Can we search the internet for the answer? Of course, we can, but answering this question in this manner is not genuine research. What constitutes original research is formulating the question, designing an experiment that will help address the formulated question, and analyzing the results at the end. And this is exactly what John B. Jemmott, III, PhD; Loretta S. Jemmott, PhD, RN; Geoffrey T. Fong, PhD have done in a published work:

Downloaded from  http://archpedi.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=382798
Downloaded from  http://archpedi.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=1263349

The above is presented here to illustrate what research really is, how it is designed, and how the results are disseminated. The abstract (which serves as a summary of a research article) is as follows:

Objective  To evaluate the efficacy of an abstinence-only intervention in preventing sexual involvement in young adolescents.
Design  Randomized controlled trial.
Setting  Urban public schools.
Participants  A total of 662 African American students in grades 6 and 7.
Interventions  An 8-hour abstinence-only intervention targeted reduced sexual intercourse; an 8-hour safer sex–only intervention targeted increased condom use; 8-hour and 12-hour comprehensive interventions targeted sexual intercourse and condom use; and an 8-hour health-promotion control intervention targeted health issues unrelated to sexual behavior. Participants also were randomized to receive or not receive an intervention maintenance program to extend intervention efficacy.
Outcome Measures  The primary outcome was self-report of ever having sexual intercourse by the 24-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes were other sexual behaviors.
Results  The participants' mean age was 12.2 years; 53.5% were girls; and 84.4% were still enrolled at 24 months. Abstinence-only intervention reduced sexual initiation (risk ratio [RR], 0.67; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.48-0.96). The model-estimated probability of ever having sexual intercourse by the 24-month follow-up was 33.5% in the abstinence-only intervention and 48.5% in the control group. Fewer abstinence-only intervention participants (20.6%) than control participants (29.0%) reported having coitus in the previous 3 months during the follow-up period (RR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.90-0.99). Abstinence-only intervention did not affect condom use. The 8-hour (RR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.92-1.00) and 12-hour comprehensive (RR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.91-0.99) interventions reduced reports of having multiple partners compared with the control group. No other differences between interventions and controls were significant.
Conclusion  Theory-based abstinence-only interventions may have an important role in preventing adolescent sexual involvement.

The article is "free", which means it does not require a subscription to access the full version. So anyone could click on the link provided as a caption (http://archpedi.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=382798) and read the entire article. The design of the experiment is described in great detail, demonstrating the need to control carefully factors that may affect results. This is quite different from simple statistics. Variables are identified and a thoughtful consideration is made such that the results will indeed answer the question that was raised. Another feature of research is its unbiased nature. The bias can easily come from the funding source behind the research. The research cited here was funded by the National Institutes of Health. At the end of this publication, one would see the following:

Financial Disclosure: None reported.
Funding/Support: This study was supported by grant R01 MH062049 from the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH).
Role of the Sponsors: The NIMH had no role in study design; collection, analysis, or interpretation of data; or the writing of the article.
Disclaimer: This article is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIMH.

Last but not the least, research work before it could be published needs to be peer-reviewed. This article went through such process. An article submitted for publication is first sent to the editor or one of the associate editors of the journal for consideration.  If the article seems fit to be considered, the editor then sends the manuscript to two or three experts in the field who can then evaluate competently the merits of the paper under consideration. These are the peer-reviewers. Only with a recommendation from these peer-reviewers would a manuscript be published. The paper could be rejected and this does not happen only rarely. Oftentimes, a paper could be accepted after being modified. The peer reviewers can recommend changes to correct errors in the original manuscript. The journal is overseen by a board of editors, who are likewise recognized experts in the field in which materials in the journal are being published. In this particular journal, members of its editorial board are found in this link.

It takes a lot to do research. It is expensive. It is time-consuming. However, if one is asking the same question, "Does abstinence-only sex education work?", the above paper is very useful. And this hopefully illustrates why original research is so important. It is reliable. One is not just quoting a blogger. This is an example of a true primary source.

Sunday, August 19, 2012

On DepEd's K to 12 and the RH Bill

These two initiatives of the Philippine government share a lot in common. First, both claim a promise of a better future for Filipinos. Of course, initiatives must have this claim, otherwise, these would not be popular. Unfortunately, another thing these two have in common is the manner and substance of their analysis and discussion. K to 12 ignores what is required to implement correctly the program and pins its hope that by simply adding kindergarten and two years at the end of high school, quality in basic education will be achieved. K to 12 is not grounded on published and peer-reviewed scientific studies, and its rationalization is mostly based on anecdotes, personal stories, and ideology. K to 12 misses the most important element in basic education, the teachers. Likewise, the RH bill is focused so much on the warring ideologies. The stand made by the Roman Catholic Church in the country has been underscored so many times that the RH bill has become a repudiation of the Catholic Church. K to 12's main argument is that the Philippines is not in par with world standards of basic education. The world standards of basic education are not stated in terms of number of years. There are international tests that help determine the output of basic education. And in these tests, clearly the number of years of basic education does not matter. As pointed out by Israel (and others), the major factor correlating with the good performance of students in these tests is the way a country treats its teachers. The best performing countries are those who pay their teachers good salaries. The RH bill may likewise end up the same way, missing the most important element behind health, the doctors and health care professionals. The same way quality education is not determined solely by a curriculum, reproductive health is not determined purely by access to medicine.



The arguments on RH bill have reached a recent low when the majority leader of the Senate lifts his arguments from grey literature. Findings in science and medicine are published in journals that are peer-reviewed. The web is full of misinformation. Before, it takes a lot of resources to spread misinformation. With the internet, spreading the information no longer requires printing. Thus, it is now more important than ever to know when information has been vetted and when information is simply bogus. Peer review in science and medicine accomplishes the much needed examination of experimental results and claims. For this reason, initiatives like K to 12 and the RH bill require input from peer-reviewed scientific literature, and not from anecdotes and hearsay. Simply reading something from the web or a book is not sufficient for arguments in science. These need to be based on peer-reviewed published data. The reasoning from the other side is likewise tainted as some advocates focus heavily on correlations between economic development and use of contraceptives. And as in education, artificial means of birth control is only one factor. As in K to 12, the RH bill must be focused on maternal health and reducing infant mortality rate. These are the far more realistic objectives. And with this emphasis, one can then see what the bill really needs so that its implementation can indeed go farther than a simple pissing match between ideologies.

Friday, August 17, 2012

When Scientists Are Underpaid....



Plight of Pagasa employees prompts calls for salary hike, review of Magna Carta for Scientists
PUBLISHED ON AUGUST 17, 2012

A storm has been brewing, not only within the Philippine area of responsibility but within weather bureau Pagasa itself.

By INA ALLECO R. SILVERIO
Bulatlat.com
MANILA — Various organizations have declared their full support for the fight of the employees of PAGASA, or the Philippine Atmospheric, Geophysical and Astronomical Services Administration. The sorry economic plight of the weathermen and women have prompted calls for across-the-board salary increases for state workers and a review of Republic Act 8439 or the Magna Carta for Scientists, Engineers, Researchers and Other Science and Technology Personnel in Government.
The weathermen and women of Pagasa led by their union Philippine Weathermen Employees Association (PWEA) said they have not been receiving their benefits since March. According to the group’s president Ramon Agustin, many employees of Pagasa, including the weather forecasters have not been reporting for work because they did not have enough money for transportation.Ordinary employees receive P7,000 to P8,000 ($ 167 to $190) monthly in benefits, but those who rely heavily on the benefits suffered greatly when the benefits were suspended.
PWEA has been raising their concerns about the suspension of such benefits since March. The benefits include subsistence allowance of P160 ($3.80) per day, hazard pay equivalent to 15 percent of their salary, as well as the longevity pay.
Agustin said Pagasa’s healthcare insurance provider terminated its contract with the agency because employees were unable to meet the monthly premiums. He also said that because of the failure of the government to release their benefits, a weather observer and union member died last May 24 from a stroke that was a complication of diabetes. The man, Alex San Pedro, reportedly died because he was unable to take his maintenance medicine.
The group said their situation went against what is mandated by the Magna Carta for Scientists. The latter stipulates that employees should receive benefits, longevity and hazard pay and the subsistence allowance and laundry allowance or Sala.
The progressive alliance of government employees the Confederation for the Unity, Recognition and Advancement of Government Employees (Courage) immediately supported the Pagasa employees, saying that their issues are very valid and are no different from the plight of all the 1.4 million state workers nationwide.
“Our basic pay has been frozen to starvation levels and yet the administration has continuously withheld the benefits we used to receive that augments our meager pay. This situation must be addressed or else the government shall face a strong storm brewing from its own backyard,” said Courage president Ferdinand Gaite.
Gaite opined that the bureaucracy is losing the best and the brightest employees because they are forced to join the private sector out of necessity.
“They need to support their families. Salaries in the government for ordinary, rank and file employees are hardly large. We have been witnesses to the diaspora of our scientists, forecasters, meteorologists, geologists and other science and technology personnel to private local and foreign companies because of our own government’s policy of cheap labor. In the case of Pagasa employees, besides having to suffer low pay, the forecasters are forced to endure the constant berating and ridicule of Pres. Aquino who calls them inefficient,” he said.
In July 2010 and in the wake of tropical storm Basyan, Aquino gave weather officials a dressing down for making a wrong forecast of the typhoon’s direction. Basyang hit the metro suddenly, catching residents and disaster unaware and unprepared. Also last week, during a meeting of the National Disaster Risk Reduction Committee, the president scolded the Pagasa representative for lowering the rainfall warning in the morning and raising it again after a few hours.
Heavy responsibilities, no funding
Gaite said what Aquino refuses to acknowledge is how the agency is ill-equipped and its technology is outdated.
Pagasa’s mandate and functions are comprehensive and heavy. In a report on its website, the agency is said to carry the task of maintaining a nationwide network pertaining to observation and forecasting of weather and other climatological conditions affecting national safety, welfare and economy. It also undertakes activities relative to observation, collection, assessment and processing of atmospheric and allied data for the benefit of agriculture, commerce and industry. The agency is also tasked to engage in studies of geophysical and astronomical phenomena essential to the safety and welfare of the people; as well as undertake researches on the structure, development and motion of typhoons and formulate measures for their moderation.
Another heavy function of Pagasa is to maintain linkages with local and international scientific organizations and promote exchange of scientific information and cooperation among personnel engaged in atmospheric, geophysical and astronomical studies.
For all intents and purposes, however, Gaite said even as Pagasa has a Modernization Law and a Magna Carta for employees, both remained unfunded and ultimately useless.
Gaite said that besides pushing for benefits for state workers, Courage continues to actively campaign for a a P6,000 ($142) increase in their minimum pay. The current minimum pay (or Salary Grade 1 Step 1) is only P9,000 ($ 214) when the mandatory deductions for the Government Social Insurance System (GSIS) , Philhealth and PAG-IBIG premium payments, withholding tax and others have been taken out . Even by government estimates, a family of six need at least P30,000 ($714) a month for its cost of living. A Pagasa forecaster receives a gross pay of P12,000 ($286)
The Department of Budget and Management (DBM) this year withheld various benefits of state workers on the pretext that these were already integrated, factored in on their salaries. Even the Collective Negotiations Agreement (the public sector counterpart of CBA) Incentive was capped by the DBM. Courage consequently filed a case at the Supreme Court questioning the said action.
In a report in Malaya, PWEA’s Agustin said the employees of Pagasa are demoralized.
“It’s difficult to accept that our long-standing request that the DOST and the government immediately release our Magna Carta benefits has not been acted upon. We have long suffered trying to survive without these benefits; having these benefits taken away was a blow against our dignity, but we gritted our teeth and bore it because we wanted to show how important our service is for our fellow Filipinos,” Agustin said.
Review the Magna Carta
The lack of implementation of the Magna Carta is also to blame for the brain drain in the country. This was pointed out by Dr. Giovanni Tapang, the chairman of Advocates of Science and Technology for the People(Agham) and vice-President of Kalikasan Partylist.
Tapang said there are are ambiguous provisions between the law and the implementing rules and regulations, resulting in various interpretations to the disadvantage of eligible scientists.
Tapang said provisions in the law declare that its money will come from the General Appropriations Fund, but on the other hand, the implementing guidelines state that funding sources for these incentives should be derived from the savings of the agency. This, Tapang said, is a recurring problem not just in Pagasa and the DOST, but also in other government agencies whose employees are eligible for Magna Carta benefits.
“This matter should be addressed to put an end or at least lessen the exodus of scientists who play a crucial role in national development and the country’s progress,” he said.
The Magna Carta was passed supposedly as part of the government’s recognition of the contribution of science and technology professionals for the country’s development and progress.
The government by passing the law declared itself to be committed to the promotion of science and technology through development of human resources. Among the magna Carta provisions are the provision of scholarships and popularization of science culture and incentives for pursuing careers in science and technology.
According to Tapang, however, since the law was enacted in in 1998, it did put a stop to the country’s brain drain. He said that In 1998, there were 9,877 science workers who went out of the country to seek for better opportunities abroad. After more than 10 years, the number has grown by 148 percent. Some 24,502 S&T professionals that include engineers and health workers have left the country to seek greener pastures or to pursue further studies and better research opportunities abroad.
Government workers victims of rationalization
Bayan Muna Partylist Rep. Teddy Casiño, for his part, has called for the immediate release of the Magna Carta benefits of the Pagasa employees.
“We need to recognize the heroic efforts of our weather bureau workers, not just through words but through concrete actions. They should be given their rightful and lawful benefits,” said Casiño.“Pagasa workers have the right to protest. The law entitles them to receive hazard pay, longevity, laundry and subsistence allowances. Denial or delays in the release of such benefits is unjust and a disservice to the people whom they serve.”
Casiño questioned how the the Department of Science and Technology (DOST) through its Administrative Order No 002 series of 2007 charges hazard pay to “appropriations and/or savings of the agency.” Pagasa is an adjunct agency of the DOST.
Casiño like Courage’s Gaite said the Pagasa workers’ predicament is not an isolated case, citing the protests of public health workers nationwide over unpaid hazard pay since January this year, pending the approval of the Department of Budget and Management for the use of agency savings. Even though exposed to all kinds of hazards in hospitals and communities in their course of duty, health workers are denied of the P2,000-P8,000 ($48-$190) per month hazard pay mandated by RA 7305 or the Magna Carta of Public Health Workers.
“Our government workers in Pagasa and public hospitals should not bear the brunt of so-called ‘rationalization’ of the government benefits system being done by the DBM,” said Casiño.
“We cannot just tell our public servants to wait and suffer some more, especially in the face of calamities in addition to the increasing prices of oil, utilities and basic commodities. If we expect them to provide hourly weather updates or timely and life-saving medical service, the government give them humane compensation. Otherwise we will be pushing more of our brightest workers out of government service and out of the country,” Casiño said.
Stop berating state employees
The Kilusang Mayo Uno (KMU) in the meantime criticized Pres. Aquino for lecturing the Pagasa employees about their duties while at the same time refusing to give a date as to when the employees will receive their benefits.
DBM secretary Florencio Abad in a statement has said that the employees will get their retroactive benefits once some kinks have been ironed out. He said that Pagasa and DBM are also discussing the matter. Depending on the longevity of the service of an employee, he or she may get anywhere from P3, 500 to P6,000 ($83 to $142) per month of hazard pay and all these benefits will be given retroactively.
In a surprise visit to Pagasa, however, Aquino reminded the employees that their agitation is adding to the worries of our countrymen with the ongoing monsoon rains and the typhoons that had been visiting the country the past weeks.
“He should stop lecturing Pag-asa employees about their duty to the nation amidst the typhoon season and start addressing the demands of these government employees,” said KMU chairman Elmer Labog.
“General promises with no timetables won’t do. If Pres. Aquino really wants Pagasa employees to fulfill their duties to the nation well, then he should immediately act on their just demands,” he added. “Pagasa employees have shown their worth for the nation with years of dedicated service while Aquino has been ineffective when it comes to addressing the disasters that continue to afflict the country.

Thursday, August 16, 2012

On Scientific Evidence ....

Senator Sotto, in a privileged speech at the Senate, attempted to justify his position against artificial contraception by using the same words and argument posted in a blog called "Sarah, the healthy home economist". I do not know if the senator has his own speechwriter but the senator denies plagiarism, stating that it was never hidden that parts of his speech were being taken from a book written by Natasha Campbell-McBride. Campbell-McBride wrote a book that talked about the importance of bacteria in the human digestive system and claimed a connection between the use of the pill and a "gut syndrome", an imbalance in the microbes in one's system. Sotto may deny plagiarism, but he could not deny propagating myths and unfounded medical claims. Campbell-Mcbride is simply an example of quackery, one who thrives on personal testimonials and anecdotes. There have been other claims made by Campbell-Mcbride such as autism is caused by vaccines. Evidence-based medicine is published and peer-reviewed in journals. None of these claims are based on data that have been examined by other experts. These are all alternative explanations based on anecdotes which basically tell what they want to say and support what they claim.

The lack of scrutiny of claims is pervasive in a society that does not recognize the importance of peer review in science and medical journals. Publication in scientific literature submits findings to others so that these could be verified or refuted. Here is another claim from the Philippines official website:
_________________________________________________________________


Local language instruction boosts new language proficiency


By Alex Romeo R. Fernandez
Thursday 16th of August 2012
DAGUPAN CITY, Pangasinan, Aug 16 (PIA) -- Instruction using native languages does not only help one in assimilating lessons but also in becoming proficient in other languages.

Renato Santillan, a teacher of Filipino at the Dagupan City National High School, said the Department of Education (DepEd) has found out that students who are taught using their native language have 80 percent chance of becoming fluent in other languages. 
_______________________________________________________________________________









The question is: Where is the published and peer-reviewed study? The above is a huge claim. One could only imagine the impact of such results. Up till now, California, New Mexico, Arizona, and other states still deal with the question of immersion versus bilingual education. And here it is in the Philippines, it is claimed that "students taught using their native language have 80 percent chance of becoming fluent in other languages". That is almost one hundred percent.

Now, there are certainly instances when one does not need a science journal to be properly informed. For instance, one can look directly at information:

Picture taken from Dr. Tabios lecture on Ondoy flooding.
Downloaded from Mon Ramirez facebook page
Yet, even facing direct information, we choose to ignore. The problem seems not only rooted in a lack of acknowledgement of proper scientific practices or reporting. It is a simple case of choosing the truth we want to hear and see.

Tuesday, August 14, 2012

"Muster the Courage and Wisdom to Vote"

Faculty members of Ateneo de Manila University recently endorsed the Reproductive Health Bill. The professors signed the endorsement as individuals making it clear at the end that they are not representing the views of their other colleagues, the university, and the Society of Jesus. As an institution of higher learning, I am confident that the Ateneo will continue to respect intellectual freedom. Without such, a university crumbles. At one level, it is easy to see how one's way of thinking can succumb to pressure. There are punitive actions that can be taken by an authoritarian administration. In various blogs, the Catholic Church has been equated to an antiquated institution bent on punishing its members who do not follow the marching orders handed down by the bishops. The fact that proposed Reproductive Health bills in the Philippines have not moved forward in Congress has been blamed fully on pressure and influence from the Roman Catholic Church. It has been more than one hundred years since the friars of the Spanish empire had full control of the archipelago, yet the people of the Philippines still think that the tyranny is still present. The Catholic Church is accused of meddling with politics although for so long, there really has not been a "Catholic vote". Marcos, after all, stayed in power for twenty years in spite of Catholic priests being openly against his administration.

Without doubt, the Philippines indeed had its share of imprisoning intellectuals. These are political prisoners. They get jailed simply for what their beliefs and views.

But there is a different type of tyranny that exists. To the intellect, what is really scarier is to go against the trend. Among intellectuals going against the flow requires one to muster the courage and wisdom to think. Straying away from what is fashionable can mean isolation. It can mean being ignored.

Human nature begs for an audience. And not only an audience, but an audience that claps their hands in applause. It is probably one reason why Facebook has the "Like" button.

So the argument goes; The Philippines is among a less than handful of countries that have only ten years of basic education. The country is being left behind by other nations and is not meeting current global standards (even though there is really no global standard for basic education). But the threat of the "fashion police" is real. And it is the threat that can truly kill an intellectual. Who would want to be labeled as being against the Philippines becoming at par with its neighbors?

Scientists at times have managed to rise above "Argumentum Ad Populum", although in most cases, funding could still be influenced by what society dictates. Society does pay taxes so it is reasonable that society must retain its voice in terms of research funding and priorities. On publications, however, science does not recognize the "argument by what is popular". Scientific publications are peer reviewed and are backed by data and evidence.

Issues such as poverty, climate change, population growth, and basic education have a science dimension. Intellectuals need only to muster the courage and wisdom to be sincere and honest. Still, the "fashion police" are out there. You really would not want to be ignored and have "0" likes on Facebook....

State Universities and Colleges - Philippines

Kabataan reveals cover-ups, deceptions in P37.1-B proposed SUCs budget for 2013

Despite President Benigno Aquino III’s pronouncement that the country’s 110 state universities and colleges (SUCs) will receive a hefty increase in their budget next year, Kabataan Partylist Rep. Raymond Palatino pointed out “cover-ups” and “deceptions” in the P37.1-billion SUCs budget proposed by the Department of Budget and Management (DBM) next year.
During the congressional budget deliberation for the proposed allocation for the Commission on Higher Education (CHED) and SUCs today, Palatino said that the P37.1 billion budget is still “grossly insufficient” and is actually driving state schools to further commercialization schemes, including tuition increases and other income-generating activities.
In his 2013 budget message, Aquino said “Hindi po pinababayaan ng aking administrasyon ang ating mga pampublikong pamantasan, at higit sa lahat, ang mga iskolar ng bayan,” explaining that DBM increased the allocation for SUCs by almost 44 percent or P11.3 billion, to P37.1 billion from the current P25.8 billion.
“At first glance, it seems that the government is shifting its earlier pronouncement that it will gradually reduce state funding for SUCs to force them to utilize their internal income. Such move is a direct response to the clamor of students who have arduously fought for greater state subsidy in the past years. However, instead of being all praises for the Aquino administration, students remain unimpressed and dismayed, as the 2013 budget is a cover-up budget full of potholes and deceptions,” Palatino said.
Cover-up budget
Palatino said that not the whole P37.1 billion will go to SUCs. “If we remove the automatic appropriations for employees’ pension and the funds that are actually part of the Miscellaneous Personnel Benefits Fund (MPBF), we would see that SUCs will actually get only P32.7 billion,” the youth solon explained. (See Table 1)
Of the P37.1 billion proposed budget for SUCs, P2.1 billion is allotted for retirement and life insurance premiums (RLIP), the fund for pension and other benefits of retired employees. “This is an automatic obligation of the government and is actually not part of the operating budget for SUCs,” Palatino said.
Meanwhile, P2.2 billion is set aside and is part of the MPBF, which is the fund for unfilled positions in SUCs. DBM withholds this budget not unless SUCs request for its utilization given proper documentation. “As we pointed out before, this fund is like DBM’s own pork barrel, which it can dispense at its whim,” the youth solon explained.
Table 1. Details of the 2013 DBM-proposed budget for SUCs
Direct to SUCs₱ 32,771,509,000
Miscellaneous Personnel Benefit Fund₱ 2,203,235,000
Retirement and Life Insurance Premiums₱ 2,153,221,000
TOTAL₱ 37,127,965,000
Source: DBM
Sans RLIP and MPBF, SUCs will only receive P32.7 billion, up by only 37 percent from the current P23.8 billion budget.
“There might be a nominal increase, but if we consider how much SUCs actually need, it is still grossly insufficient,” Palatino said.
According to DBM, SUCs requested a total of P54.6 billion for 2013. However, only P37.1 billion, or almost 68 percent was approved by DBM for inclusion in the National Expenditure Program (NEP). (See Table 2)
Table 2. Proposed versus DBM-approved 2013 SUCs budget
Proposed by SUCs
Recommended by DBM
Percent approved
PS*
₱31.149 B
 ₱27.333 B
87.75
MOOE
₱ 8.506 B
 ₱6.429 B
75.58
CO
₱14.958 B
 ₱3.365 B
22.5
TOTAL
₱54.613 B
 ₱37.127 B
67.98
*Includes funds for RLIP
Source: DBM 
Without the fund for RLIP, the fund for salaries and benefits of teachers and employees of SUCs which falls under the personal services (PS) component, there is a P2.35 billion or an 11 percent increase to P22.97 billion from the current P20.62 billion budget. “However, this increase only corresponds to the implementation of the fourth tranche of the Salary Standardization Law III next year,” Palatino said.
Meanwhile, the fund for maintenance and other operating expenses (MOOE) is set to increase by P3.42 billion or over 88 percent, to P6.43 billion from the current P3 billion budget. Bulk of the increase or P1.3 billion will go to the University of the Philippines, while the remaining P2.1 billion increase will be shared by over 100 SUCs.
However, Palatino revealed that three SUCs (see Table 3) are set to receive hefty cuts in the MOOE component, due to CHED’s Normative Funding Formula, which rationalizes the MOOE budget allocation for SUCs based on performance indicators, including enrollment and passing rates.

Table 3. SUCs with cuts in MOOE
2012 MOOE2013 MOOEPercent
change
Aurora State College of Technology₱ 28.4 M ₱11.5 M -59.50
Cebu Technological University
 (Cebu State College of Science
and Technology)
₱ 209.5 M ₱93.4 M

-55.40
Adiong Memorial Polytechnic
State College
₱3.1 M₱1.5 M
-52.41






Meanwhile, a large portion of the increase in the budget of SUCs is due to the allocation of funds for capital outlay (CO), the budget for building infrastructure, for all SUCs next year. This year, only UP received funding for CO worth P190 million. Next year, the budget for CO ballooned to P3.17 billion.
However, Palatino pointed out that the P3.17 billion DBM-proposed budget for CO is only 23 percent of the total P14.95 billion requested by SUCs. “If one considers the fact that the national government has not given any CO for the past two years, the P3.17 billion only attempts to cover up the cuts in the past in a very poor manner,” the youth representative said.
In fact, the Philippine General Hospital under UP, will not receive any CO for next year. “Clearly, this is a cover-up budget meant to appease the growing dissent of students and administrators,” Palatino added.
Tuition increases
According to DBM’s Budget of Expenditures and Sources of Financing, the budget agency expects an almost P1-billion increase in the internal income of SUCs, to P14 from the current P13.1 billion.
Part of the projected increase in income, or P500 million will come from tuition payments, which is expected to increase to P6.76 billion from the current P6.26 billion. Also, DBM projects that income from other fees would increase by P200 million, to P3.2 billion from the current P3 billion.
“This is a clear indication that behind the supposed increase in the budget of SUCs, spiralling tuition rates will remain and would even intensify. DBM’s projections are already telling,” Palatino said.
Continued misprioritization
The P37.1 billion proposed budget for SUCs is only 0.31 percent of the country’s gross domestic product  (GDP) for 2013, a far cry from the 16.8 billion budget allotted for debt servicing, Palatino said. The P275.9 billion total budget allotted for the Department of Education and SUCs, meanwhile, is only 2.3 percent of the country’s GDP, far from the United Nation’s six-percent recommendation for education.
According to the Congressional Policy and Budget Research Department, the Philippines remains to be one of the countries with the smallest per capita spending for higher education. The said study revealed that the government spends only $625 per college student per year, less than the budget allotted by neighbouring countries like China ($2,728), Malaysia ($11,790) and Indonesia ($666).
“It is clear that the nominal increase for SUCs does not change the government’s policy on higher education. Access remains a challenge, and funding remains inadequate,” Palatino said. “In this light, the youth will continue and even intensify the fight for sufficient government funding for an education sector that truly serves the nation,” Palatino ended

Sunday, August 12, 2012

Wrong Approach

by Atty. Aleck Francis "Koy-koy" T. Lim
Bohol Standard Online
So far, many Filipinos are not happy with the new educational system recently introduced by the administration and implemented by DepEd. It’s like giving a wrong medicine to a misdiagnosed illness. If the purpose of the K+12 Program is to improve quality of our education, the government must first address the old problems before it tackles new ones. The 2-year extension of mandatory public education in our country has received a favorable support both from politicians and top honchos of the Department of Education. By looking at all the good intentions this revised program wants to achieve, it appears that the plan is on the winning side. However, there are serious problems DepEd and the government must first look into. The extension is of course costly. More classrooms, books, and teachers will be added to the system. And that’s where the more serious issues crop up. How can the government add more classrooms when in fact today we do not have enough classrooms for all students? How can the government add more books for the K-12 program when in fact many students are still deprived of books at schools? All can be aggravated by the fact that we are losing brilliant teachers to Western and Asian countries who continuously hire Filipino teachers to teach core subjects abroad such as English, Math and Science. Isn’t it wise and logical, and simply an exercise of common sense, that before we become very serious with the K-12 (additional two-year program) educational change we should first address and fix the tangible deficiencies of our education? DepEd cannot just plunge into the future of uncertainties without first looking at the current problems that besiege Philippine education. We have not mentioned of the declining quality of Philippine education. While our Asian neighbors have made gigantic leaps in harnessing their educational system, ours is still stuck with mediocrity and traditionalism. And we cannot just ignore the fact that even our English proficiency, which for decades had made us remarkable in the world, is fast deteriorating. By introducing a revised educational system without first repairing its loopholes, the government has become guilty of reckless dreaming. We have to see first the current reality before we entertain good dreams otherwise the K-12 program might just turn out as another nightmare for everyone. And we should not forget to mention the noodles scandal at DepEd in which almost half a billion pesos was wasted on the so-called noodle feeding program for malnourished pupils. That scandal had given us a perspective that the K-12 program might as well be a subtle ploy for DepEd officials to set up a new source of personal income for those who have personal interests in government funding. What bothers us most is the seeming blindness of the DepEd. It has to see first the ancient problems that scuttle the entire educational system in the country before it moves to a bolder step. Failure to do so would just result to multiplication of the existing problems of Philippine education.